News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Senators Blast Facebook for Concealing Instagram's Risks ... by 1vuio0pswjnm7 on Thursday September 30, 2021 @06:02PM (#28711882)
"She said Facebook takes "the privacy, safety and well-being of all those who use our platform very seriously, ...""

The magic incantation.

Flawed reasoning: "We take X seriously" therefore there are no problems with X.

Contrast "seriously" with "seriously enough".

There must be more to it. There must be some science behind the use of the "take X seriously" statements.

"We've committed to not retaliating for this individual speaking to the Senate," she said.

Do they know who it is. Do they believe retaliation would be legal.

"Facebook's brand is bad, and I think Facebook, you know, would freely admit that," said Katie Harbath, a former public policy director at the company. "But, you know, nobody else is gonna come and defend the company besides themselves."

Why won't anyone else come and defend the company. Wouldn't advertisers, users (ad targets) and investors want to defend the company.

"In this next chapter of our company, I think we will effectively transition from people seeing us as primarily being a social media company to being a metaverse company," [Zuckerberg] told tech journalist Casey Newton this summer.

Try to escape bad rep. Social media bad. "We are not social media. We are metaverse."

"They've been able to weather these storms over and over again," said Yael Eisenstat, who worked at Facebook on elections integrity for political advertising in 2018.

"What I think is different this time is that I don't think they're fully understanding that internal employees have questions now."

After Facebook has "connected the world", then what. No more growth. What then.

Re:Senators Blast Facebook for Concealing Instagram's Risks ... by mbesto on Thursday September 30, 2021 @06:48PM (#28712260)
Sidenote:

> "We take X seriously" therefore there are no problems with X.

This is my favorite response doing Tech DDs. I meet execs who say "we take security seriously" all of the time. I enjoy the follow-on of "ok show us then"...

Do you backup your DB? Do you test it? No?

Do you encrypt everything at rest? No?

Are you using MFA for all services that are accessible by developers? No?

etc. etc.

Then no, you don't take security seriously.

Re:Senators Blast Facebook for Concealing Instagram's Risks ... by effingwewt on Friday October 01, 2021 @04:26AM (#28715962)
OMG preach! When you've heard these empty platitudes enough they become warning klaxons.
Re:Senators Blast Facebook for Concealing Instagram's Risks ... by ssss11 on Thursday September 30, 2021 @06:42PM (#28712216)
Isn’t the magic just that humans sometimes believe what is said rather than what is done? You need to watch what people do, and whether they actually do what they say.
Re:Senators Blast Facebook for Concealing Instagram's Risks ... by bilekas on Thursday September 30, 2021 @06:46PM (#28712249)
don't forget :

> "I want to be clear: This research is not a bombshell."

It's not, because you knew about it.

Re:Senators Blast Facebook for Concealing Instagram's Risks ... by myfartsarefoul on Thursday September 30, 2021 @06:35PM (#28712142)
When they try to change the way they’re viewed instead of bringing up relevant facts, you know that they know that they don’t have a leg to stand on.

I say we do to Facebook what JFK wanted to do to the CIA.

Imagine social media without a profit motive. Decentralize, distribute and encrypt the fuck out of it. I don’t want curated feeds, I want to keep in touch with people I know.

Re:Senators Blast Facebook for Concealing Instagram's Risks ... by dragonwriter on Thursday September 30, 2021 @06:36PM (#28712155)
> I say we do to Facebook what JFK wanted to do to the CIA.

Use it to invade Cuba?

Re:Senators Blast Facebook for Concealing Instagram's Risks ... by lugged on Thursday September 30, 2021 @08:14PM (#28712858)
Get dead?
Re:Senators Blast Facebook for Concealing Instagram's Risks ... by hermitwriter on Thursday September 30, 2021 @10:08PM (#28713715)
Except like all of these services, people actual do engage more with a curated feed. I just wish there were at least an option to go chronological.