News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Cloudflare's Disruption. Parent comment

Re:Cloudflare's Disruption by throw_away on Thursday September 30, 2021 @02:01PM (#28709160)
Interesting, too, as the unreleased pre-cursors to S3 were called first S5, and then S4.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cloudflare's Disruption by jamesfinlayson on Friday October 01, 2021 @12:38AM (#28714617)
What did the extra S's stand for?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cloudflare's Disruption by simonebrunozzi on Friday October 01, 2021 @02:38AM (#28715357)
Never heard of S5. S4 stood for Simple Server-Side Storage. Source: at AWS 2008-2014.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cloudflare's Disruption by rsj_hn on Friday October 01, 2021 @02:50AM (#28715424)
Secure Simple Server-Side Storage is still on the backlog :P
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cloudflare's Disruption by throw_away on Saturday October 02, 2021 @10:32AM (#28728857)
Simple Server-Side Storage Service IIRC
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cloudflare's Disruption by discodave on Thursday September 30, 2021 @02:29PM (#28709490)
You mean T4 and U5!

Oh wait, pretty sure those are EC2 instance types. :p

[ Parent | on HN ]