Re:Google Parcel Service? Search giant patents shipping noti...
by EvanKelly on Wednesday August 10, 2011 @06:59PM
(#2870580)
Is doing the same thing as someone already does, but from a different role in the relationship really patentable?
Apparently.
Re:Google Parcel Service? Search giant patents shipping noti...
by mburns on Wednesday August 10, 2011 @08:10PM
(#2870785)
Toasted bread was patented in 2000:
Re:Google Parcel Service? Search giant patents shipping noti...
by CamperBob on Wednesday August 10, 2011 @08:18PM
(#2870806)
At 2500 degrees? That's novel, I guess, but it sounds more like a patent for sublimating the bread than for toasting it.
Re:Google Parcel Service? Search giant patents shipping noti...
by EvanKelly on Wednesday August 10, 2011 @08:31PM
(#2870834)
I can't believe I read an entire patent on "Bread Refreshing", but I agree that this is different than what conventional toasters do.
I thought it was interesting that they restricted time from 3 - 90 seconds. I wonder what kind of bread can undergo 3000 degree temperatures for 90 seconds and still be edible.
Re:Google Parcel Service? Search giant patents shipping noti...
by aristidb on Wednesday August 10, 2011 @07:30PM
(#2870680)
It is totally non-obvious that somebody else than normally would send tracking information.
Sorry for the snark.
Re:Google Parcel Service? Search giant patents shipping noti...
by zoips on Wednesday August 10, 2011 @07:55PM
(#2870753)
I do like that parsing the claims and determining what is being described is actually harder than designing the system from scratch when you actually finally figure out what the hell the patent is actually about.
However, it seems like a real stretch for non-obviousness: they're trying to patent the idea of doing exactly what every shipping-status system does, only as a third party that simply queries those services, and then sends emails to the user when something changes.
Maybe it's a business-method patent rather than a technology patent. It's not even a patent on notification-system querying, because Amazon does that, only it does it for products it sold. It seems the only thing the claim is claiming as novel is the business idea of doing it as a third-party monitoring service.