> Based on my observations, when people lose their income (particularly as a result of policies they disagree with), they often become angry. On one hand, this can be enjoyable for observers. But then on the other hand, sometimes Mother Nature has a surprise in store that more than makes up for the pleasure. Let's hope for everyone's sake that this is not one of the times that the law of unintended consequences pays us a visit.

Would you mind not being cryptic and stating what you actually mean? I don’t expect people to find my beliefs tasteful or agree with them, but I am laying them out on the table to discuss at least.

Domestic terrorism is one potential outcome that doesn't seem all that far-fetched.

If your claim is "handle these people with carebear gloves or they are gonna domestic terrorism you", then I ask you to consider why that logic would not work in reverse. If you have an entire group of people saying "let me spread this virus amongst your people and if you even try to say I am wrong, I will terrorize your people" what do you think the response from any rational group is?

While you haven't said it directly as you are, in my opinion, a coward. I see how you are implying that society should let the crazy do as they like or they will attack anyone who disagrees.

You should consider how well that went for the Confederate States of America when they decided their gumption could dominate industrial might and innovation.

Good luck sir, Mother Nature has a surprise in store for those who think they can outfeel logistics. Say hi your boog bois too

Thank you for the advice, and I offer some in return: be careful to not mistake what seems to be for what actually is.