News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:YouTube is banning anti-vaccine activists and blocking al... by unanswered on Wednesday September 29, 2021 @02:50PM (#28698165)
> Significant non-deadly outcomes are another story (permanent lung damage, loss of taste, ect)

Is there credible, non-censorious evidence that the vaccine reduces these particular risks? This is the same argument that we keep seeing: you have to take this vaccine because ${thing that vaccines normally do but this one hasn't been shown to do}. The most egregious example is "provide immunity"/"improve outcomes for anyone around you". I just don't believe a word of it until I see the science.

Re:YouTube is banning anti-vaccine activists and blocking al... by nneonneo on Wednesday September 29, 2021 @03:50PM (#28698984)
I don’t know what level of convincing you need, but here in BC, unvaccinated people are about 25x more likely to show up in a hospital than vaccinated people:

https://news.gov.bc.ca/releases/2021HLTH0058-001843

Over the past two weeks:

> After factoring for age, people not vaccinated are 25.8 times more likely to be hospitalized than those fully vaccinated.

(The age correction reflects the fact that vaccines aren’t distributed evenly by age).

Re:YouTube is banning anti-vaccine activists and blocking al... by unanswered on Wednesday September 29, 2021 @04:00PM (#28699114)
Sorry, I just don't believe these numbers. Even mainstream media sources have begun admitting that hospital admission rates are meaningless because they reflect mostly test results from hospital admissions for concerns other than covid symptoms. It is interesting that despite this the unvaccinated are showing up more, but because it is for example plausible that the unvaccinated are just plain leaving their homes more, I think that actual scientific study is needed to explain these numbers.

I recognize that it's ridiculous to be in a situation where I'm rejecting facts; that's a great way to be led completely astray. But that's the world that censorship has created.

Re:YouTube is banning anti-vaccine activists and blocking al... by heavyset_go on Wednesday September 29, 2021 @07:24PM (#28701308)
> I recognize that it's ridiculous to be in a situation where I'm rejecting facts; that's a great way to be led completely astray. But that's the world that censorship has created.

Sounds to me like you're blaming everyone else for something that's completely under your control.

Re:YouTube is banning anti-vaccine activists and blocking al... by _moof on Wednesday September 29, 2021 @05:21PM (#28700124)
What will you believe?
Re:YouTube is banning anti-vaccine activists and blocking al... by unanswered on Wednesday September 29, 2021 @06:47PM (#28700981)
As I said,

> I think that actual scientific study is needed to explain these numbers.

Science is not done in the media. I'm tired of being told that I have to believe the science that's on TV when every single time I investigate it turns out the science says the exact opposite. The non-scientific "facts" in the media are even worse; take those overwhelmed hospitals in Oklahoma and the nationwide overwhelmed poison control centers, which were both bold-faced lies. (In case you've missed the non-retractions, Oklahoma hospitals denied having ivermectin patients and only 2% of calls to poison control had anything to do with covid.)

Re:YouTube is banning anti-vaccine activists and blocking al... by CyberDildonics on Wednesday September 29, 2021 @07:44PM (#28701442)
You dodged the question of what you actually would believe.

You were linked a government study, then said "science is not done in the media"

Re:YouTube is banning anti-vaccine activists and blocking al... by unanswered on Wednesday September 29, 2021 @10:15PM (#28702469)
The only link I see in this thread is a government press release, not a scientific study. The first step is to be able to distinguish those.
Re:YouTube is banning anti-vaccine activists and blocking al... by CyberDildonics on Wednesday September 29, 2021 @10:25PM (#28702522)
That's not a press release, it's a summary of government data, which they source here:

http://news.gov.bc.ca/files/8-31_PHO_modelling.pdf

And here:

http://www.bccdc.ca/health-info/diseases-conditions/covid-19...

You still didn't answer the question of what would you actually believe. It seems like you might just call anything you don't like "the media". Let's see where you get your information.

Re:YouTube is banning anti-vaccine activists and blocking al... by _moof on Wednesday September 29, 2021 @08:23PM (#28701776)
That link isn't from the media.
Re:YouTube is banning anti-vaccine activists and blocking al... by unanswered on Wednesday September 29, 2021 @10:14PM (#28702462)
Did you miss the first (last) component of the address? "news"? It's a press release, which is a step in the wrong direction from the media. I was attempting to steelman the opposing position by upgrading it to media interpretations of press releases.
Re:YouTube is banning anti-vaccine activists and blocking al... by nneonneo on Wednesday September 29, 2021 @07:13PM (#28701219)
I believe you’ve made your point that nothing will reasonably sway you. Even if a “scientific” study is performed (and many are certainly in progress - but science is slow!) you can simply latch on to any flaw in the study to reject the results.

Give me a good explanation of how a 25x effect size can be hand waved away. Even if you consider “leaving their homes more”, I have a tough time believing that you’ll be able to come up with an effect size that large on that basis alone.

As an addendum to this, I’ll point out that several jurisdictions dealing with very severe case loads, including Alberta and Saskatchewan in Canada, have cancelled many elective procedures in favour of putting more COVID patients in their wards. Doesn’t sound like these are “concerns other than COVID symptoms” to me.

Re:YouTube is banning anti-vaccine activists and blocking al... by NotSammyHagar on Thursday September 30, 2021 @12:12AM (#28703106)
Yes, I agree with you. People are so scared by the "scary potential dangers" that aren't happening that they don't take something that reduces their risk of death by massive amounts, 20+x times.

All you "young" people not taking the shot, there are lots of otherwise relatively young people dying every day. Don't die needlessly. Search for stories of people who regretted not taking it on your deathbed. Do you want your mom or dad to live without you?

Re:YouTube is banning anti-vaccine activists and blocking al... by mbg721 on Thursday September 30, 2021 @12:16AM (#28703120)
You're going to make an anecdote-based emotional appeal to an audience whose belief that they're being manipulated has constantly been validated by incompetence, corruption, and censorship?