News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Private censorship is not the best way to fight hate or d... by simonh on Wednesday September 29, 2021 @01:49PM (#28697306)
But surely fewer channels means fewer recruits? Ultimately it's about what kind of content these platforms want to publish though.
Re:Private censorship is not the best way to fight hate or d... by inglor_cz on Wednesday September 29, 2021 @01:55PM (#28697403)
It might also mean "higher quality recruits".
Re:Private censorship is not the best way to fight hate or d... by gremloni on Wednesday September 29, 2021 @06:26PM (#28700795)
And that’s okay. Fewer “higher quality” recruits are easier to go after individually.
Re:Private censorship is not the best way to fight hate or d... by inglor_cz on Thursday September 30, 2021 @02:24AM (#28703723)
History says that well-organized, even if smaller movements, have higher chances of achieving their goals.

I can recommend this article about inefficiency of online movements:

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2019/05/in-pe...

Re:Private censorship is not the best way to fight hate or d... by gremloni on Thursday September 30, 2021 @07:25PM (#28712509)
You can say the same about forces that work against the criminals as well except they’re well organized and have larger numbers.

Your link doesn’t take into account if the chilling effect is what leads to ephemeral online hate movements.