Re:YouTube is banning anti-vaccine activists and blocking al...
by syshum on Wednesday September 29, 2021 @02:39PM
(#28698028)
> I assume that you wouldn't mind if YouTube recommended you some ISIS beheadings for example
You act as if the recommendation engine forces people to watch content...
No one if forcing anyone to click on and consume a recommended video... Most of the videos recommended to me I do not watch,
How did "just turn the channel" i.e ignore the video in today's nomenclature become an invalid option?
Re:YouTube is banning anti-vaccine activists and blocking al...
by Andrew_nenakhov on Wednesday September 29, 2021 @12:55PM
(#28696427)
Why would you want to remove videos of beheadings? Can there be a better example to teach people that ISIS is a wild barbaric horde that must be destroyed?
Continuing your line of thinking, what would you want to remove next? 9/11 videos of planes flying into buildings? Holocaust documentaries? Surely, these videos can give bad ideas to viewers...
Re:YouTube is banning anti-vaccine activists and blocking al...
by duhast on Wednesday September 29, 2021 @01:51PM
(#28697327)
I personally agree with you. Issue is that this view is not shared by the majority of the population. Even naked female nipples are still somehow offensive to some people.
Imagine being called ISISTube. This wouldn't be good for business especially with the family oriented crowd.
RIP LiveLeak.
Re:YouTube is banning anti-vaccine activists and blocking al...
by datenarsch on Wednesday September 29, 2021 @03:52PM
(#28699020)
And how can you be so sure to know what views are shared by the majority of the population?
Most people would support it. Based on your response, I assume that you wouldn't mind if YouTube recommended you some ISIS beheadings for example. Who would be to judge if the video is real or not? It could be just artistic reconstruction. Free speech absolutists would never trust YouTube to make this determination.