So you trust the government to decide what is true and what isn’t but not YouTube?

Or we can move beyond the concept of trust. How about not banning content you don't like?

Huh? That makes no sense.

There is no need for trusting anybody. The concept that we must trust the government or YouTube to determine truth is ridiculous. How about neither of them ban content they don’t like?

As individuals, we shouldn’t trust. We should verify.

OK great. So do you have a chemistry lab in your house to verify that the toothpaste you buy doesn’t contain heavy metals? Do you do your own testing of the meat you buy to ensure it doesn’t contain BGH, antibiotics, parasites? Do you manufacture your own water testing kits since you can’t trust sending samples to a lab? Do you manufacture your own computing devices since you can’t trust that others aren’t spying on you using your phone or laptop?

This is the kind of answer a 14 year old who hasn’t yet grasped the concept of not-absolutism would give. It’s absurd.

I am now incredibly interested in what the term “market share of information” is, because that’s a brand new nonsense term I’m sure will spread like wildfire.

Should fox news be required to give equal time to liberal opinion hosts? It's the biggest cable news outlet.

Not to mention they have a near total monopoly on conservative viewership! How else can a liberal operator reach those people?

Wasn't the fairness doctrine made to enable that?

Except they aren’t acting as an arbiter of truth. They are just regulating their own platform. It’s not a secret that they are doing this.