News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pausing “Instagram Kids” and building parental supervisio... by tshaddox on Monday September 27, 2021 @02:30PM (#28674226)
This is extremely important, and something I think many people don't realize. Charging a fee might make it possible for a company to be profitable without needing ad revenue, but it likely won't change the underlying economics such that also showing ads won't be even more profitable. The only ways around this that I can see are 1) a company steadfastly choosing to forgo the ad revenue, 2) a company maintaining a customer base that is willing to pay the subscription fee and has a principled opposition to ads such that introducing ads wouldn't be viable, or 3) somehow reorganizing the economy such that the negative externalities of advertising are greatly reduced.
Re:Pausing “Instagram Kids” and building parental supervisio... by DaiPlusPlus on Monday September 27, 2021 @02:41PM (#28674373)
> somehow reorganizing the economy such that the negative externalities of advertising are greatly reduced.

What “negative externalities” are you referring to?

Re:Pausing “Instagram Kids” and building parental supervisio... by tshaddox on Monday September 27, 2021 @04:18PM (#28675499)
Some simple and direct ones to start with: bandwidth and CPU usage, blatant malware, annoyance.
Re:Pausing “Instagram Kids” and building parental supervisio... by DaiPlusPlus on Wednesday September 29, 2021 @04:00PM (#28699115)
Strictly speaking, I don't think those are "externalities" though