Benchmark results: Cassandra 4.0, 3.11, Scylla 4.4 [video]

Re:Benchmark results: Cassandra 4.0, 3.11, Scylla 4.4 [video] by orthecreedence on Monday September 27, 2021 @12:59PM (#28673199)

I didn't understand Cassandra/Scylla until I realized that it's basically a k/v store that lets you append data to existing keys. If your storage needs fit that domain, then I can vouch for Scylla being amazing to work with.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Benchmark results: Cassandra 4.0, 3.11, Scylla 4.4 [video] by fennecfoxen on Monday September 27, 2021 @01:33PM (#28673623)

To put it in slightly more detail, it's a two-level data structure with two keys, a Dict[SortedList[Any]], to use Python type syntax. The top level key is also the sharding key.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Benchmark results: Cassandra 4.0, 3.11, Scylla 4.4 [video] by jjirsa on Tuesday September 28, 2021 @02:17AM (#28679834)

Modern Cassandra is more like Dict[SortedList[Row]], where the row is basically a SQL row just like you’d expect in any SQL database

[ Parent | on HN ]