News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:San Francisco raises Tesla 'self-driving' safety concerns... by mwint on Sunday September 26, 2021 @09:47AM (#28660861)
You’re missing the point: Random bystanders are run over by human drivers all the time. But when a human driver makes a mistake, we can’t analyze what happened and push out an update to everyone else.
Re:San Francisco raises Tesla 'self-driving' safety concerns... by d3nj4l on Sunday September 26, 2021 @09:49AM (#28660876)
That’s fine, but you can’t sign people up for medical trials just because people die from diseases anyway. You don’t get to force other people into becoming Guinea pigs for science.
Re:San Francisco raises Tesla 'self-driving' safety concerns... by happytiger on Monday October 04, 2021 @05:39PM (#28752404)
Unfortunately or not, this is exactly what Deaths per X miles driven statistics actually are. And that’s the statistic set at the base of automotive safety policy decision making.

https://www.iihs.org/topics/fatality-statistics/detail/state...

Re:San Francisco raises Tesla 'self-driving' safety concerns... by happytiger on Monday October 04, 2021 @05:38PM (#28752390)
Unfortunately or not, this is exactly what Deaths per X miles driven statistics actually are. And that’s the statistic set at the base of automotive policy making.

Here: https://www.iihs.org/topics/fatality-statistics/detail/state...