News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Food fraud and counterfeit cotton: detectives untangling ... by ilamont on Friday September 24, 2021 @01:07PM (#28645143)
One source? There are multiple sources, including eyewitness accounts, reports from Chinese and Uyghur exiles, western experts, and even satellite imagery:

"The findings of this research contradict Chinese officials' claims that all 'trainees' from so-called vocational training [centers] had 'graduated' by late 2019," report author Nathan Ruser wrote. "Instead, available evidence suggests that many extrajudicial detainees in Xinjiang's vast 're-education' network are now being formally charged and locked up in higher security facilities, including newly built or expanded prisons, or sent to walled factory compounds for coerced [labor] assignments."

https://www.npr.org/2020/09/24/916665128/report-satellite-im...

Re:Food fraud and counterfeit cotton: detectives untangling ... by pphysch on Friday September 24, 2021 @01:22PM (#28645322)
Okay, so far you've linked Adrian Zenz and Raytheon-mouthpiece ASPI.

Is it really so much to ask for a source that doesn't have an obvious and massive Conflict of Interest in destabilizing China?

Re:Food fraud and counterfeit cotton: detectives untangling ... by nosianu on Friday September 24, 2021 @01:28PM (#28645416)
> have an obvious and massive Conflict of Interest in destabilizing China?

If only you would apply what you demand of others to your own brazen statements.

Re:Food fraud and counterfeit cotton: detectives untangling ... by pphysch on Friday September 24, 2021 @01:32PM (#28645458)
Rigorous, fact-based scrutiny is "brazen"? Ridiculous. Is this Reddit, or HN?

Please stay on topic: where are your primary sources that don't have a massive Conflict of Interest? It's okay to admit you don't have any.