News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Authenticated Boot and Disk Encryption on Linux by deckard1 on Thursday September 23, 2021 @03:37PM (#28634172)
> Anecdote != data

Thank you Captain Obvious.

> And unlike the other folders, if you lose this one you lose the whole system

Yeah, that's how encryption works.

> but bit flips for any reason

Way to move the goalposts. Your typical laptop/desktop does not have ECC RAM. You're also not using mirrored ZFS anyway. So not only will you never detect corruption, but you have no way to correct it either. Which, again, is totally overkill for the average user.

Re:Authenticated Boot and Disk Encryption on Linux by SkyMarshal on Thursday September 23, 2021 @10:13PM (#28637916)
> Way to move the goalposts.

If your entire system is vulnerable to a single bit flip and you don't care then, you may be on the wrong website.

> Your typical laptop/desktop does not have ECC RAM. You're also not using mirrored ZFS anyway. So not only will you never detect corruption, but you have no way to correct it either.

This is HN, not your typical computer user's website. My personal desktop workstations use both registered ECC and mirrored ZFS (along with immutable reproducible builds, among other things to enhance system integrity and reliability).

And I have no compunction whatsoever about recommending on this site that people use cheap and easy methods to safeguard against LUKS header corruption, like backup USBs and faraday bags.

That's an extremely cheap form of risk management that could prevent loss of your entire hard drive due to a single bit flip. If I were recommending something prohibitively expensive relative to the potential losses, your objections might be reasonable, but I'm not.

> Which, again, is totally overkill for the average user.

Again, this isn't a site for the average user, expect folks here to practice and recommend higher standards for computer system management.