Technically no. But I guess you could describe what he did was to lie with the truth. He manipulated his accusers to define sex precisely so that he could honestly answer that he had not had sex.

Now if only if this whole sordid affair had been rock bottom rather than the beginning of the decline but that's another story...

He was accused of lying to Congress, which resulted in an article of impeachment that could have removed him from office had he not been acquitted. Lying to Congress is pretty serious indeed.

Depends on the definition of the word "is".

> There's no "there" there!

Sorry, wrong Clinton.