News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Manyverse – A social network off the grid by strict9 on Tuesday September 21, 2021 @04:40PM (#28609646)
>Under the hood, scuttlebutt uses multiple independent blockchains, each tied to a single user.

Now wondering why the landing page for Manyverse prominently says: "No token. No ICO. No blockchain."

It makes the downside you mention "making it a very storage-intensive protocol" more interesting, and confusing for someone trying to understand the tech stack behind it.

Re:Manyverse – A social network off the grid by jonstaab on Tuesday September 21, 2021 @04:43PM (#28609676)
Maybe I'm getting some semantic distinction wrong. Each user's thread is essentially a cryptographically linked list. It differs from Bitcoin for example in that there's no change of ownership, and so no forking or input/output transactions, it's just a linear list of events. There are no gas fees or tokens, since there's no need to pay for anything, each peer voluntarily gossips information.

The description you cited is also probably more for marketing purposes than technical explication. No one wants to use a social media platform built on ETH, the experience is just horrible.

Re:Manyverse – A social network off the grid by px43 on Tuesday September 21, 2021 @04:52PM (#28609772)
Yup, that's just a Merkle tree.

In a blockchain, blocks occur at regularly timed intervals, and are distributed globally, which is all enforced by some distributed authority mechanism, like Proof of Work. Rumor has it that Satoshi was originally going to call the data structure a "Timechain" but wanted to emphasize the cryptographic integrity feature more than the time keeping feature.

Re:Manyverse – A social network off the grid by keshet on Thursday September 23, 2021 @02:04PM (#28632779)