A-10 can carry 16,000 lbs of ordinance alone, including that brrrt stuff and 2000 lb bombs.
AH-64 can carry 8,000 lbs, including fuel.
Which is a big concern when… not fighting either.
The AF is still running the A-10 because they've not managed to get rid of it yet — not for lack of trying, but because when they try the army suggests taking it off their hands and if there's one thing the AF likes less than CAS, it's the idea of the Army getting fixed-wing units.
Which does not matter because it's not a role anyone actually needs.
> It's no longer a weapon system that's suitable for use against peer/+.
Which has not actually been needed in 75 years, unlike a weapon system suitable for use in asymmetric conflicts.
But nobody serious responsible for managing our defence thinks that. Hence why the capability needs to be upgraded.
...to get annihilated by Russian or Chinese air defences.
> What I’m not sure about is why aren’t they using Apaches, Comanches, Scorpions (all helicopters) etc instead for close air support?
I don't think the USAF operate these platforms do they?