News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Surprising Story of the First Microprocessors (2016) by xyzzy21 on Friday September 17, 2021 @04:37PM (#28570632)
The patent exists but NOTHING was done with it and nothing was brought to market or practical use.

Ideas are cheap and worthless - it's the execution that matters. That execution in the context of a patent is a viable product or use.

MOSFETs were NOT viable until the 1960s. RCA made the first practical metal-gate CMOS that is known as the "4000 series" of logic parts. And even then, that technology didn't take off until all the other problems of mobile ions, threshold tuning, etc. were finally solved to give us CMOS as we know it today.

There are always wankers who point to this patent, but it really doesn't matter because it took another 50 years to achieve anything that mattered.

Re:The Surprising Story of the First Microprocessors (2016) by Rochus on Friday September 17, 2021 @06:21PM (#28571557)
> There are always wankers ...

Gutter language does not make the argument more convincing.

Re:The Surprising Story of the First Microprocessors (2016) by approxim8ion on Friday September 17, 2021 @06:25PM (#28571600)
I'd argue that tone policing doesn't refute the argument either.
Re:The Surprising Story of the First Microprocessors (2016) by Rochus on Friday September 17, 2021 @07:23PM (#28572006)
Among civilized people, calling someone (the author of the referenced article in this case) a wanker is considered an insult; and it is definitely not compliant with HN rules.
Re:The Surprising Story of the First Microprocessors (2016) by approxim8ion on Saturday September 18, 2021 @06:02AM (#28574981)
> is definitely not compliant with HN rules

This I agree with. Similarly, elitist virtue-signaling like "gutter language" and "among civilized people" aren't compliant with the rules either.

You're free to check.

Re:The Surprising Story of the First Microprocessors (2016) by Rochus on Saturday September 18, 2021 @08:46AM (#28575790)
Being civilized is barely seen as elitism by the majority of people here.
Re:The Surprising Story of the First Microprocessors (2016) by approxim8ion on Saturday September 18, 2021 @09:03AM (#28575912)
Regardless, your comments fall on the wrong side of "Don't be snarky" and "Please don't sneer."

But clearly, you've picked this hill to die on and this conversation is going nowhere. Have a good day.

Re:The Surprising Story of the First Microprocessors (2016) by Rochus on Saturday September 18, 2021 @09:46AM (#28576230)
> your comments fall on the wrong side of "Don't be snarky" and "Please don't sneer."

I politely disagree.