Re:The Surprising Story of the First Microprocessors (2016)
by approxim8ion on Friday September 17, 2021 @06:25PM
(#28571600)
I'd argue that tone policing doesn't refute the argument either.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Surprising Story of the First Microprocessors (2016)
by Rochus on Friday September 17, 2021 @07:23PM
(#28572006)
Among civilized people, calling someone (the author of the referenced article in this case) a wanker is considered an insult; and it is definitely not compliant with HN rules.
Re:The Surprising Story of the First Microprocessors (2016)
by approxim8ion on Saturday September 18, 2021 @06:02AM
(#28574981)
> is definitely not compliant with HN rules
This I agree with. Similarly, elitist virtue-signaling like "gutter language" and "among civilized people" aren't compliant with the rules either.
You're free to check.
Re:The Surprising Story of the First Microprocessors (2016)
by Rochus on Saturday September 18, 2021 @08:46AM
(#28575790)
Being civilized is barely seen as elitism by the majority of people here.
Re:The Surprising Story of the First Microprocessors (2016)
by approxim8ion on Saturday September 18, 2021 @09:03AM
(#28575912)
Regardless, your comments fall on the wrong side of "Don't be snarky" and "Please don't sneer."
But clearly, you've picked this hill to die on and this conversation is going nowhere. Have a good day.