Let's say you make $1,000,000 a year in California. Your effective tax rate is 11.78 percent because the top 12.3% rate is only applied to income you earned over $599k. (13.3% applies only on income above $1,000,000, which you are too poor to pay yet).
Same with federal taxes, that $1,000,000 earner is going to pay an effective rate of 33.3%. Combined, you are paying 45% state and federal income tax.
In California, the highest possible tax rate on earnings, would be 50%.
In Australia that tax on the highest earnings would be 45%.
Nowhere did I claim that all your income is taxed at the same rate. I was replying to the quote "federal tax caps out at 37%" which ignores the significant 13% additional tax in CA.
There is also an extra tax to pay for college that graduates (4 percent) pay if they make more than $39k (AUD I think, not sure what the basis that they have to pay is, however).
Both healthcare and college seem to be funded separately from income taxes.
It might be that overall the poor get a better deal in Australia. But surely it's not because of the income taxes (slightly higher than CA for low earners) or the consumption taxes (much much higher than CA). Maybe they get a better deal on health insurance and payroll taxes, plus the idea of paying for college via successful graduates is one that America should definitely consider adopting.
See e.g. https://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=247046 where someone points out that CT does the same and calls it recapture.
https://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/12/nyregion/highest-tax-will...
https://www.empirecenter.org/publications/new-yorks-ugly-ste...
But the craziness with the most recent changes doesn't end there. From July 2021, employers are required to withhold from bonuses and overtime at the new supplemental rate of 13.78%, which is quite a bit higher than even the top bracket. That guarantees even more and larger refunds for taxpayers next year. Or, if you look at it another way, a bigger interest-free loan to the state.