That said, I'm fully aware that it's easier to avoid meat in some places than in others. Living in the middle of a capital city, good meatless options were everywhere around, but after moving to suburbs of the same city there's not that much meatless stuff that I can order with delivery, for instance. It can also cost more, making it much less available for some social groups (although I hope it's just a matter of time and economy of scale, because in the end there's no reason why would it stay more expensive). Nevertheless, cutting meat intake by around half still doesn't seem that hard, it doesn't even take much effort once you already got to know the alternatives.
Do you think the above are equivalent to what you're asking regarding meat? Why or why not?
What's much more challenging is to make people care about danger enough to be willing to change their personal behavior even in slightest ways.
> Do you think the above are equivalent to what you're asking regarding meat? Why or why not?
Of course it's not equivalent, because this thread is explicitly not about giving up meat consumption.
Conversely, if everyone went vegetarian, that would pose a severe risk to humanity in the form of well documented negative health effects.