Did AS8003 just disappear?

Re:Did AS8003 just disappear? by eppp on Friday September 10, 2021 @10:20PM (#28488933)

I get plenty of requests for static ipv4 from smb and home users.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Did AS8003 just disappear? by abestic9 on Saturday September 11, 2021 @12:55AM (#28489525)

I could see that being down to IPv4 allocation issues, specifically CG-NAT or dynamic pools, that people want to avoid.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Did AS8003 just disappear? by soultrees on Saturday September 11, 2021 @12:56AM (#28489529)

You get plenty of requests for the static part of it and less so for actual ipv4. If there was an option for static ipv6 then people would also request that instead. Static IPs have use cases that people in the wild need, however I don’t think anyone cares if it’s ipv4 or ipv6.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Did AS8003 just disappear? by toast0 on Saturday September 11, 2021 @01:41AM (#28489671)

I mean, I'd love static both, but I'm going to ask for static v4 first, because I can always run a tunnel for static v6.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Did AS8003 just disappear? by taneliv on Saturday September 11, 2021 @05:13AM (#28490550)

Why couldn't you do it the other way around? Run a tunnel for static IPv4 over IPv6.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Did AS8003 just disappear? by toast0 on Saturday September 11, 2021 @09:44AM (#28491929)

Because there's not a mainstream (and free) tunnel broker for IPv4.

[ Parent | on HN ]