News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Money creation in the modern economy (2014) [pdf] by whimsicalism on Thursday September 09, 2021 @04:40PM (#28474396)
Yes, there are plenty of powers that we limit to a subset of chartered organizations. If you want to have a share in this power, you can buy ownership in a bank - a share of JP Morgan is about $160.

I disagree that it is intrinsically wrong that some people can do something that you cannot do.

Re:Money creation in the modern economy (2014) [pdf] by majormajor on Thursday September 09, 2021 @05:00PM (#28474588)
You don't have to be a chartered bank to have this power.

If your neighbor lent you a hundred bucks and you loan ninety bucks of it to a different neighbor, you've done the same sort of thing. Of course, if you do it at a small scale, you're at high risk of having empty pockets if that neighbor wants their hundred back at an unexpected time. But do it to a thousand neighbors on either side of the exchange, and you can probably get away with re-lending most of it for a long time.

They aren't granted special money-making abilities; more the reverse: they are under regulations to prevent this power - which is, in happy times, very good for the economy - from being abused. We can argue about if those regulations are strong enough or not, but I think the "money is bullshit cause banks print it out of thin air" arguments are intentionally misleading from opponents of a system that otherwise isn't actually terribly complicated.

Re:Money creation in the modern economy (2014) [pdf] by andrepd on Thursday September 09, 2021 @04:52PM (#28474519)
Well that's a very unsatisfactory answer. As to the 1st paragraph: what do you mean? That's not at all what I'm saying, buying shares in JPMorgan doesn't give me money creation privileges. As to the 2nd: if you restrict rights and privileges to one group of people you better have a good reason why! Just saying "it is so" is not a good reason :)