Re:California aims to ban recycling symbols on things that a...
by subandi on Thursday September 09, 2021 @09:37AM
(#28469523)
that's not true: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/mcdonalds-100-beef/
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:California aims to ban recycling symbols on things that a...
by detritus on Thursday September 09, 2021 @09:40AM
(#28469546)
I'm not sure that's the same problem. I think Parent means that beef from elsewhere arrives in Ireland, is processed there and becomes 'Irish beef', which is clearly a bit of a stretch of the truth.
It's the same in Europe with many types of olive oil - much of it is grown and extracted in Iberia, but then sent to Italy, etc, for processing, becoming 'Italian' olive oil..
Doesn't bother me though - my favourite olive oil comes from Spain...
Re:California aims to ban recycling symbols on things that a...
by subandi on Thursday September 09, 2021 @09:44AM
(#28469603)
Yeah I'm not disputing the general point that some people would do something like that. But the specific claim about a company called "100% Irish Beef" sounded a bit outlandish, so I googled it.
Re:California aims to ban recycling symbols on things that a...
by Closi on Thursday September 09, 2021 @10:29AM
(#28470075)
> I'm not sure that's the same problem. I think Parent means that beef from elsewhere arrives in Ireland, is processed there and becomes 'Irish beef', which is clearly a bit of a stretch of the truth.
The problem is that it isn't true - the 100% British & Irish beef is actually beef from Britain & Ireland. It's a myth that it's the company name.
English & Irish law on the country of origin of products is pretty strong and certinally does not allow processed beef from other countries to be labelled/marketed as British. Also a 5 minute google search shows this is just simply an urban legend.