Re:IBM mainframe beats other platforms for cost and performance
by evol262 on Wednesday September 08, 2021 @12:50PM
(#28459724)
If those were goalposts, they weren't clear. The miss is that the article in the link doesn't discuss VMs or virtualization at all, so talking about oversubscription/etc seemed like an ad-hoc commentary on the hardware configuration unless I totally missed that in the article, but searching for "virtual", "VM", "vCPU", "subscribe", etc didn't find anything. There's a limited amount of effort I'm gonna put into digging into additional links on "Planet Mainframe" pushing mainframes.
That aside, comments on articles are sometimes more general. "How do mainframes compare in 2021?" is a conversation which is not intrinsically linked to "should you oversubscribe VMs 66:1 for this specific workload?", and I interpreted your comment at the former. I wasn't talking about the article at all.
Re:IBM mainframe beats other platforms for cost and performance
by tw04 on Wednesday September 08, 2021 @01:09PM
(#28460030)
> The miss is that the article in the link doesn't discuss VMs or virtualization at all, so talking about oversubscription/etc seemed like an ad-hoc commentary on the hardware configuration unless I totally missed that in the article
There is a giant table in the middle of the article that is impossible to miss if you read it. It literally says # of VMs. As well as calling out VMware, and z/VM as tye hypervisors in use. The oversubscription is a simple math problem, and that's assuming best case scenario.
>All of these VMs running production Ora/OAM/OEM/Websphere workloads? No, don't oversubscribe. Some of them running similar workloads? More oversubscribe is ok. Few of them? Lots of oversubscribe.
All of the VMs are running Oracle/Websphere/Apache, per the link. That is what the article is recommending, which is where my skepticism came and is coming from.
>I am having a generalized discussion about virtualization oversubscribe. You are having a specific discussion about CPU-heavy DB workloads. Apples cannot be compared to oranges.
Everyone in this thread is talking about the article, I guess everyone but you.