I clicked through some Accenture links (#2 on the list) and they clearly comply with the Colorado hiring law. They even have a section dedicated to the Colorado law and the wage range:

> As required by the Colorado Equal Pay Transparency Act, Accenture provides a reasonable range of minimum compensation for roles that may be hired in Colorado. Actual compensation is influenced by a wide array of factors including but not limited to skill set, level of experience, and specific office location. For the state of Colorado only, the range of starting pay for this role is {$215,000 - $324,999 } and information on benefits offered is here.

How are you generating this list? The first link I clicked on showed the exact opposite of excluding Colorado hiring due to the law. Are these listings compiled by searching for generic terms like “Colorado”? Is anyone verifying them?

> I clicked through some Accenture links (#2 on the list) and they clearly comply with the Colorado hiring law. They even have a section dedicated to the Colorado law and the wage range:

> > As required by the Colorado Equal Pay Transparency Act, Accenture provides a reasonable range of minimum compensation for roles that may be hired in Colorado. Actual compensation is influenced by a wide array of factors including but not limited to skill set, level of experience, and specific office location. For the state of Colorado only, the range of starting pay for this role is {$215,000 - $324,999 } and information on benefits offered is here.

> How are you generating this list? The first link I clicked on showed the exact opposite of excluding Colorado hiring due to the law. Are these listings compiled by searching for generic terms like “Colorado”? Is anyone verifying them?

> How are companies and listings added? > Job listings are currently user submitted with a manual review process to verify that a job listing is excluding Colorado. Anyone can submit listings to /new and our team will frequently review the submitted listings to see if they should be listed on the rest of the website.

https://www.coloradoexcluded.com/about

It's funny that idk if you're trying to shame these companies or the government of Colorado because either would make sense depending on your POV.

Either or neither would make sense. They don't necessarily need some agenda beyond being informational, hard as that is to imagine.

I kinda like that you can draw your own conclusion there. Makes the site more fun.

What do you pay to host the site? It seems to have survived the hug of death so far, great work.

Very inspirational to see work from an old colleague at the top of HN. Hope you're doing well!

Rackspace is doing it, and this tool isn't detecting it.

https://jobs.lever.co/rackspace/d18e6926-5c2d-49fc-8553-ba61...

>Position is available for remote work in the following states unless otherwise specified. Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming.

Hawaii is excluded as well. I wonder if it for legal or timezone/travel/covid reasons.

edit - looks like they have a fair amount of openings, and all the remote ones have CO excluded.

Alaska is also excluded, so timezone/travel sounds pretty likely.

Neat idea and great execution!