US Cybercom says mass exploitation of Atlassian Confluence vulnerability ongoing

Re:US Cybercom says mass exploitation of Atlassian Confluenc... by Bahamut on Monday September 06, 2021 @01:42PM (#28436108)

This comment nails it - anyone who has had to investigate other offerings that satisfy the needs of project management, design, and engineering will quickly find that all the other options out there are total garbage in comparison to Jira, which is why Jira remains at the top of the totem pole for what it does.

As an engineer & former manager, there are definitely things I didn't like about Jira like slowness, but everything else I investigated/used were worse in multiple significant ways.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US Cybercom says mass exploitation of Atlassian Confluenc... by marcinzm on Monday September 06, 2021 @02:00PM (#28436308)

My current company tried Monday. The engineers begged for Jira after that.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US Cybercom says mass exploitation of Atlassian Confluenc... by cmorgan31 on Monday September 06, 2021 @02:30PM (#28436565)

There's a worse world - one where you have on prem Jira, Monday, Paper, O365, Confluence, Github, and internal api documentation all out of alignment with the other. I'm begging to just end my misery.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US Cybercom says mass exploitation of Atlassian Confluenc... by matwood on Monday September 06, 2021 @03:26PM (#28437046)

The other thing about jira is it’s configurability. I look for replacements every so often and all will require us to change our process. We have adapted jira to our exact process like I’m sure many teams have.

[ Parent | on HN ]