Re:Experiments on a $50 DIY air purifier (2020)
by fighterpilot on Thursday September 02, 2021 @03:30PM
(#28396301)
Ok, yes. Do we know how the air resistance/air flow varies as a function of surface area? Is it almost linear? I'm wondering how important it is.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Experiments on a $50 DIY air purifier (2020)
by sixothree on Thursday September 02, 2021 @05:47PM
(#28397783)
I've used both. I don't have hard numbers since they are different filters, but I replaced a 1" filter with a 4" filter and I can run my fan at a lower speed.
Re:Experiments on a $50 DIY air purifier (2020)
by ncmncm on Thursday September 02, 2021 @04:24PM
(#28396890)
Feel the air coming out, vs without a filter. The slower the air is, the fewer opportunities you get to trap each dust grain. Overall miss rate improves exponentially with airflow speed.
Re:Experiments on a $50 DIY air purifier (2020)
by aronpye on Thursday September 02, 2021 @09:22PM
(#28399452)
That doesn’t make sense, the higher the flow rate the higher the energy each particle has so more chance of it making it through the filter.
Re:Experiments on a $50 DIY air purifier (2020)
by ncmncm on Thursday September 02, 2021 @11:21PM
(#28400053)
You might imagine so, but that turns out not to be how it works. Each time through there is a chance the particle will be blocked. It doesn't matter how fast in went in, because the mv^2 of a dust mote is tiny at any plausible speed. What matters is that N trips through gives you (1-p)^N probability of not getting caught, which falls off very fast... in fact, exponentially.
A deeper-pleated filter is the way to reduce velocity in traversal.