Re:Amazon asked FCC to reject Starlink plan because it can’t...
by verdverm on Wednesday September 01, 2021 @05:51PM
(#28385953)
~2d was intended to imply effectively 2d for human activities, even airspace is probably closer to a layered 2d cake than true 3d like deeper space. LEO may be closer to an extension of airspace due to orbits and gravity. Still, due to the exponential growth with respect to the radius, there is significant room in LEO compared to anything terrestrial.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Amazon asked FCC to reject Starlink plan because it can’t...
by dylan604 on Wednesday September 01, 2021 @06:19PM
(#28386231)
How does this differeniate space and the ocean in your mind? Humans cannot survive in either without some sort of vessel to provide a suitable environment.
Re:Amazon asked FCC to reject Starlink plan because it can’t...
by verdverm on Wednesday September 01, 2021 @06:35PM
(#28386372)
My GGGP point was about "clogging" space with satellites, not about habitation. Space is so large that 100K's of satellites is still not clogged. I believe the SpaceX and AWS constellations are planned to get us pretty close to 100k iirc
Re:Amazon asked FCC to reject Starlink plan because it can’t...
by aidenn0 on Wednesday September 01, 2021 @09:41PM
(#28387763)
Quadratic growth, not exponential growth.