These issues have been around for more than a decade, but they keep popping up. The last 3-ish years a larger push has been made to disable CBC ciphers (in SSL/TLS, SSH, etc.). See [0, 1, 2, 3, and 4] for more information.
GCM/CTR is considered to be a more secure alternative.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Padding_oracle_attack#Padding_...
[1]: https://www.openssh.com/txt/cbc.adv
[2]: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5207634 (is CPNI-957037)
[3]: https://alicegg.tech/2019/06/23/aes-cbc.html
[4]: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/security/vu...
[n]: You can find more information with a quick search, this also includes security advisories from HPE, RedHat, IBM, and F5.
Edit: There's a good explanation here https://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/2310/what-is-the-...
CBC does not provide authentication, thus it does not protect your encrypted content from manipulation (which can enable all kinds of followup attacks). Generally you should avoid using unauthenticated ciphers almost always and use an AEAD.
SSH uses CBC in combination with a MAC, so it has authentication, but it combines them in an insecure way. It turns out it's practically impossible to avoid these attacks (there had been countermeasures, but it's been shown that they can be circumvented). The attacks only let an attacker decrypt a single byte in certain situations, so the practical impact is limited.
Here's the original attack: https://www.isg.rhul.ac.uk/~kp/SandPfinal.pdf
Here's an updated paper that shows that the countermeasures against the original attack don't work. https://www.isg.rhul.ac.uk/~kp/surfeit.pdf