News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:VerneMQ – A Great Alternative by onedr0p on Wednesday September 01, 2021 @08:17PM (#28387196)
It's ok, but would be great if they paid attention to their helm chart.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:VerneMQ – A Great Alternative by jvojak on Thursday September 02, 2021 @02:40AM (#28389310)
What happened to their helm chart? :D
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:VerneMQ – A Great Alternative by onedr0p on Friday September 03, 2021 @01:31PM (#28407023)
They haven't had a release in over a year.

https://github.com/vernemq/docker-vernemq/issues/238

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:VerneMQ – A Great Alternative by the_gipsy on Wednesday September 01, 2021 @05:50PM (#28385949)
How does it compare to emqx?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:VerneMQ – A Great Alternative by jvojak on Thursday September 02, 2021 @02:40AM (#28389306)
Although I am not familiar with emqx, from their web page I can see they have a more "enterprise" solution and integrations with Oracle, Timeseries database, Apache Kafka. With QoS 0 they say that message throughput is around 200,000/s while on QoS 1 it's around 100,000/s. If broadcasting, they manage to get around 900,000/s. They've got a ton of features and I'd say probably a better, but paid solution compared to some other brokers.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:VerneMQ – A Great Alternative by xupybd on Thursday September 02, 2021 @06:21AM (#28390391)
How do you know you need a message queue?
[ Parent | on HN ]