News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GCC Rust Monthly Report #9 August 2021 by steveklabnik on Tuesday August 31, 2021 @08:23AM (#28367022)
Things that have been declared stable do not "change on a daily basis" though.
Re:GCC Rust Monthly Report #9 August 2021 by volta83 on Tuesday August 31, 2021 @08:26AM (#28367047)
When was the latest Rust stable release - every 6 weeks - that did not change the "spec" at all, e.g., by adding new stable features or standard library APIs ?
Re:GCC Rust Monthly Report #9 August 2021 by steveklabnik on Tuesday August 31, 2021 @08:30AM (#28367114)
It is true that on a six-week basis we add new things. I should have been more specific, haha. The point is that the language does not make daily breaking changes, which is a reputation that we still sometimes have even after all of these years of no longer doing so.

That said, you are still right that it is a thing that the gcc-rust developers will need to keep up with.

Re:GCC Rust Monthly Report #9 August 2021 by pjmlp on Wednesday September 01, 2021 @04:27AM (#28377511)
In any case, one could consider the Rust epochs as main synchronization points anyway.
Re:GCC Rust Monthly Report #9 August 2021 by steveklabnik on Wednesday September 01, 2021 @08:48AM (#28379173)
I would not, because new things land in most editions, so it’s not like a particular edition refers to a stable subset of the whole language.
Re:GCC Rust Monthly Report #9 August 2021 by pjmlp on Wednesday September 01, 2021 @10:56AM (#28380602)
True, however with the enterprise hat I see epochs as LTS versions worthy to be the ones on CI/CD pipeline.
Re:GCC Rust Monthly Report #9 August 2021 by steveklabnik on Wednesday September 01, 2021 @11:11AM (#28380839)
I think LTS versions are great, but see them as something very distinct from editions. It is something I would like to see us have eventually.