> But ia it ne ot ia the english strange and slightly pretencious?

Oh, the irony...

For what is worth, as a non native English speaker the article sounded just fine.

As a native speaker, the article might occasionally betray its origins as something translated from another language, but tbh I was too busy enjoying the level of detail the author went into to pick at quirks of phrasing :)

I honestly don't understand what the commenter meant by "ia it ne ot ia".

Likely "is it me or is"

Thank you. Now all we need is someone to explain "pretencious".

In my personal experience (some of it on the receiving end), the "accusations" of "preteciousness" usually say more about the accuser (and their set of life experiences), than the accused.

The only person who could objectively make that claim is someone who is very-well-versed and up-to-date with the in the targeted writer's writing and/or speaking style.

That is to say - I perceive preteciousness to be something an author or orator purposefully and/or intentionally does for the specific occasion and/or audience, this being "unlike themself" for potentially spurious or considered-bad-by-the-accuser reasons. If that is the "natural" way the person in question communicates, I'd consider the claim false.

[As mentioned, from personal experience, the "new" people ("barely-an-acquitances") often mark or accuse me of it, on account of my (unintentional) code-switching and/or quite consistent mixing of my native language and English, especially when it comes to writing. Meanwhile, people who have known me for years know it to be just one of my (many) idiosyncrasies.]

I feel you gave my dumb comment more thought than it deserved. But i enjoyed the reply immensely, thanks!

One of those idiosyncrasies is intentionally taking things deadpan seriously.

And don't call me Shirley.