News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:To save California, sacrifice single-family zoning by anonuser123456 on Thursday August 26, 2021 @06:39PM (#28321949)
Agriculture is only a drain if you think eating food is unnecessary.

The pragmatic approach would simply be to price water so farmers and consumers are incentivized to use it efficiently.

Re:To save California, sacrifice single-family zoning by stevenicr on Friday August 27, 2021 @07:00AM (#28326277)
disagree with specific 'only' but not the general sentiment, however;

People growing almonds with flood irrigation (and similar high water needy things) in cali or az

almonds, pistachios, sugar beets.. these (and others) are taking a toll on california's environment to produce some luxury goods for profit - not to provide food for the starving.

Re:To save California, sacrifice single-family zoning by anonuser123456 on Friday August 27, 2021 @01:09PM (#28330351)
Producing food for the starving is hardly the problem the world faces. In regions that face starvation shipping costs and distribution networks are the bottleneck.

And almonds are hardly any more of a luxury food than a 20 minute shower or front lawn. Look at residential water consumption; how much really goes to basic living vs wasted? And how much effort goes into conserving or reusing water efficiently?

The point is to price water any let it flow to the most efficient use as determined by the market. When that happens, you’ll find that suddenly farmers stop flooding fields to grow alfalfa for Australian cattle and pick crops that are economically viable with the water constraints we have. Maybe nuts are too expensive to grow here; we don’t really know.