News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on There is no such thing as a “glibc based alpine image”. Parent comment

Re:There is no such thing as a “glibc based alpine image” by gnud on Thursday August 26, 2021 @11:54AM (#28316554)
I think they're talking about things like https://hub.docker.com/r/frolvlad/alpine-glibc or https://hub.docker.com/r/jeanblanchard/alpine-glibc
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:There is no such thing as a “glibc based alpine image” by sgerrand on Thursday August 26, 2021 @12:27PM (#28317041)
Ah, thanks for the pointer. The blog post referenced the Alpine package I maintain but was obviously implicitly referencing those Docker images.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:There is no such thing as a “glibc based alpine image” by ariadneconill on Thursday August 26, 2021 @05:38PM (#28321204)
Yes, there's several of them. The problem isn't your package, but the distribution of "alpine" images that integrate the package. Those images should describe themselves more appropriately.
[ Parent | on HN ]