Re:There is no such thing as a “glibc based alpine image”
by ariadneconill on Thursday August 26, 2021 @04:39PM
(#28320389)
Not the same argument. Combining musl and glibc runtimes into a single system is known to result in instability.
Whether it gets documented as part of a "don't do weird things" system or this update gets accepted, it needs to be addressed, as people have erroneously expected this configuration to have the same stability guarantees as stock Alpine.
That's fine! I've seen this happen with Rails all the time: newbies do something in Rails behaves differently in Rails than in vanilla Ruby, because Rails redefines core Ruby classes in ActiveSupport, and they get frustrated and angry when the thing they've copied from elsewhere doesn't work as they expect. Whether that's good or not is another matter, but that doesn't mean Ruby should prevent people from running Rails! You really shouldn't be obsessed with people liking your project to the point where you prevent anybody from doing anything with it that you haven't personally authorized.