Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity [pdf]

Re:Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced ... by babesh on Wednesday August 25, 2021 @10:44PM (#28310016)

You are a name caller. There are downsides to getting the vaccine. I know people who were down and out with side effects to the vaccine for a week. If this is accurate, then people who had covid are 18x protected vs those vaccinated.

Maybe we should introduce a covid card and only let those with them into restaurants. After all, it is likely that the combination of the reopening and breakthrough caused the spike.

[ Parent | on HN ]

[dead]

Re:Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced ... by babesh on Thursday August 26, 2021 @02:54AM (#28311492)

I stand by my statement about name calling. The person who has had covid is less likely to spread it to others than someone with just the vaccine.

I see little point in forcing them to take the vaccine much less enforce a vaccine mandate. If you want a mandate it should be natural immunity or vaccine or mask or far better just tests and masks since anyone can still catch and spread it.

You are right about 13x. I just misread that (reading on my iPhone).

I was not concerned with cost so I am not going to bother to address that.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced ... by Elinvynia on Thursday August 26, 2021 @10:25AM (#28315369)

Name calling is okay, if true. If someone is an anti-vaxxer, not calling them such only supports that extremely harmful movement. Preventing calling them anti-vaxxes is literally censorship, and likely something that you are against.

[ Parent | on HN ]