Soviet Moon Images (2004)

Re:Soviet Moon Images (2004) by baybal2 on Wednesday August 25, 2021 @12:14AM (#28297980)

American videocameras were way superior as well.

Tube cameras Russia used up into 200x were inferior than RCA ones from sixties.

Consumer technology, and monetary incentives make mirracles.

Hard to fathom that today's "supercomputer in the pocket" came out of efforts to build superior gaming PCs, and frag more people in Q3.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Soviet Moon Images (2004) by fifilura on Wednesday August 25, 2021 @03:00AM (#28298749)

> American videocameras were way superior as well.

I know you didn't phrase it exactly that way.

But we in Sweden are somewhat proud of supplying the Hasselblad cameras to the Apollo missions.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Soviet Moon Images (2004) by ninjin on Wednesday August 25, 2021 @04:40AM (#28299272)

While I greatly dislike the nationalistic undertones in your comment, you are – unlike what some responses claim – not wrong in that the video cameras for the Apollo 11 mission [1] were indeed American and made by Westinghouse [2] and lenses by Fairchild [3]. Not sure how much I would argue that it was “consumer technology” though, at least not at the time.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_TV_camera#Westinghouse_...

[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westinghouse_Electric_Corporat...

[3]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairchild_Camera_and_Instrumen...

As for the more famous non-video cameras, they were indeed made by Hasselblad [4] (Sweden) and the lenses by Zeiss [5] (West German). I am of course acutely aware of the latter as I shoot Zeiss lenses and prefer their aesthetics to pretty much anything else I have tried, although these days a chunk of them are made by Cosina [6] (Japan). If you want to dig deeper, I liked Hasselblad’s official homepage on the matter [7].

[4]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasselblad

[5]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Zeiss_AG

[6]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosina

[7]: https://www.hasselblad.com/inspiration/history/hasselblad-in...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Soviet Moon Images (2004) by skhr0680 on Wednesday August 25, 2021 @02:08AM (#28298499)

The Russians got the Zeiss factory as spoils of WWII so they made at least some decent optics.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Soviet Moon Images (2004) by dylan604 on Wednesday August 25, 2021 @01:30AM (#28298337)

Except those american videocameras were probably made in Japan. Sony, Nikon, Ikegami, JVC, ...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Soviet Moon Images (2004) by baybal2 on Wednesday August 25, 2021 @02:53AM (#28298710)

There were no Japanese videocameras in sixties

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Soviet Moon Images (2004) by bellyfullofbac on Wednesday August 25, 2021 @03:23AM (#28298889)

A quick google says you're wrong: https://global.canon/en/c-museum/product/cine253.html

What is it with Internet commenters who are cocksure despite not knowing what they're talking about?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Soviet Moon Images (2004) by baybal2 on Wednesday August 25, 2021 @03:31AM (#28298942)

This is not a videocamera

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Soviet Moon Images (2004) by bellyfullofbac on Wednesday August 25, 2021 @03:50AM (#28299040)

Well, color me embarassed. But why the pivot of the discussion to the video cameras? Maybe to emphasize "America superior"?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Soviet Moon Images (2004) by herendin2 on Wednesday August 25, 2021 @04:35AM (#28299236)

What is it with Internet commenters who are cocksure despite not knowing what they're talking about?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Soviet Moon Images (2004) by scoopertrooper on Wednesday August 25, 2021 @08:48AM (#28300955)

I completely agree, I'm sick of people being cocksure about something despite not knowing what they're talking about.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ikegami_Tsushinki#History

[ Parent | on HN ]