Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w...
by tyingq on Tuesday August 24, 2021 @04:44PM
(#28294761)
My non-tech extended family members all use separate Roku and/or FireTV devices instead of the built-in TV functionality, because I've seen the devices. I don't know why, but they do.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w...
by francisofascii on Tuesday August 24, 2021 @05:26PM
(#28295194)
Maybe because the Roku interface actually works properly, whereas the apps on the smart TV are slow and buggy.
Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w...
by jcranberry on Tuesday August 24, 2021 @05:51PM
(#28295434)
I bought a "premium" Roku box brand new for I believe $90 so I could have one with an ethernet cable. That was 3 years ago and it's currently supremely buggy. It goes green, black, crashes mid episode, if I skip a few times within a few seconds the audio might desync. It was already bad but I got a new speaker system and hooked it up to an AV receiver and it instantly got several times worse. I don't know if my experience is typical but 3 years is a disappointing lifetime for something like this IMO.
Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w...
by Arrath on Tuesday August 24, 2021 @06:24PM
(#28295734)
Very much this. I use the Netflix app on my smart TV as it mostly works without issue. Hulu stops with a black screen every few minutes. I haven't bothered to look to see if it has Disney+ or HBOmax apps, I just use my phone and chromecast to do anything other than Netflix.
Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w...
by mholm on Tuesday August 24, 2021 @04:45PM
(#28294777)
Lots of people bought Rokus/FireTVs before they had a smart TV, and now simply prefer the interface.