Re:A man spent a year in jail on murder charge that hinged o...
by emodendroket on Sunday August 22, 2021 @01:00PM
(#28267201)
It may very well be the case that a version of fire analysis that is scientifically rigorous can be done, but this would have nothing to do with how it is typically practiced.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A man spent a year in jail on murder charge that hinged o...
by colejohnson66 on Sunday August 22, 2021 @01:23PM
(#28267482)
Which is what @giantg2 said:
> The science is generally sound (procedures and theory). Usually it's the prosecutors that present the forensics in a way that misrepresents what the results actually mean.
Re:A man spent a year in jail on murder charge that hinged o...
by emodendroket on Sunday August 22, 2021 @03:51PM
(#28268910)
That’s not the same claim. The practitioners who come up with the results are not operating in a scientifically sound or rigorous way. One documentary I watched about a wrongful murder conviction (a man was found to have burned down his house to kill his entire family) had a discussion of how the fire investigators would talk about “feeling the beast” and other nonsense. It is very flattering to describe this as in any way “evidence-based.”