Re:OnlyFans banning sexually explicit content b/C of MasterC...
by christkv on Sunday August 22, 2021 @07:56AM
(#28264733)
Why are we accepting that a payment transaction company that is part of a duopoly with visa gets to define itself as the moral arbiter of legal business.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:OnlyFans banning sexually explicit content b/C of MasterC...
by Mountain_Skies on Sunday August 22, 2021 @08:04AM
(#28264780)
Because for the most part this situation has been only weaponized against those who are out of ideological compliance with the tech industry. As long as it is a tool for punishing what a small geographical area considers wrong-think, it will go on with the blessing of Bay Area tech scene. With OnlyFans there's some uneasiness because suddenly those who have been cheering on the use of this weapon are starting to realize it might expand into areas that could harm them.
Re:OnlyFans banning sexually explicit content b/C of MasterC...
by mynameisash on Sunday August 22, 2021 @08:12AM
(#28264831)
The NCAA instituted a rule[0] on the confederate flag that led to Mississippi changing their state flag[1].
Some changes, like them or not, come from very unexpected places.
[0] https://www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/29334498/ncaa...
[1] https://abcnews.go.com/US/mississippi-lawmakers-vote-remove-...