Re:Generics enabled by default in Go tip
by tptacek on Saturday August 21, 2021 @05:17PM
(#28260659)
If you believe that absolutely, the way you imply here, then we're all just chumps for not working in Haskell.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I feel like I should probably admit that I am just generally a fan of functional programming and I do think there are big benefits to it, most of the time (of course, some algorithms are just more elegant with loops and mutation). But my day job is writing services with Elixir, so ultimately complaining about generics in Go is a little rich coming from me.
At the end of the day, whatever gets the product built is what matters. I just fail to see how generics could be a hindrance.
Not necessarily Haskell, although it would be nice, there are already enough ML influences in modern languages, with exception of Go.
Confessions of a used programming language salesman
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1297027.1297078
> As a result, functional programming has finally reached the masses, except that it is called Visual Basic 9 instead of Haskell 98.