Re:ImageNet contains naturally occurring Apple NeuralHash co...
by chipsa on Friday August 20, 2021 @11:43AM
(#28247308)
DNA is only mostly founded in science. There's the interpretive element in saying: Oh, this DNA matches the suspect, even though it's mixed with the victim's blood.
Nice big clean sample? It probably actually matches. Small sample? Mixed with other people's DNA? Especially in a place they tend to visit (or live in?)?
Re:ImageNet contains naturally occurring Apple NeuralHash co...
by sennight on Friday August 20, 2021 @06:31PM
(#28252137)
At that point the problem isn't the science behind DNA, it is the fact that your freedom depends on a jury understanding statistics. But at least there exists the opportunity to challenge the evidence on objective grounds, that unfortunately requires an expensive professional expert witness...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygraph