Apple defends anti-child abuse imagery tech after claims of ‘hash collisions’

Re:Apple defends anti-child abuse imagery tech after claims ... by dabbledash on Wednesday August 18, 2021 @11:04PM (#28229883)

There’s nothing stopping governments from banning E2EE, but in the absence of such bans, no one is under any obligation to build systems that empower them to spy on their users.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple defends anti-child abuse imagery tech after claims ... by Retric on Wednesday August 18, 2021 @11:16PM (#28229959)

I wouldn’t be sure about that, the phone companies already have a legal obligation to allow wiretapping and the government is very happy to put gag orders on this stuff.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple defends anti-child abuse imagery tech after claims ... by pengaru on Wednesday August 18, 2021 @11:48PM (#28230137)

Shouldn't the E2EE apple walled-garden app equivalent of wiretapping be pushing an app update to the suspect's phone with a sidechannel added for law enforcement to snoop, with warrant in hand?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple defends anti-child abuse imagery tech after claims ... by supertrope on Wednesday August 18, 2021 @11:55PM (#28230165)

CALEA has a carve out for encryption. I’m sure when E2EE is about to be deployed to the masses the law will be updated to force key escrow.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple defends anti-child abuse imagery tech after claims ... by heavyset_go on Thursday August 19, 2021 @12:02AM (#28230200)

Courts can order them to collect data on users.

[ Parent | on HN ]