Re:Apple defends anti-child abuse imagery tech after claims ...
by robertoandred on Wednesday August 18, 2021 @05:12PM
(#28227244)
Was scanning server side not a precedent?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Apple defends anti-child abuse imagery tech after claims ...
by shapefrog on Wednesday August 18, 2021 @05:52PM
(#28227639)
Furthermore, was uploading (backing up) the entire contents of your phone to a server to be freely scaned and distributed (with warrant of course) server side not also a precedent?
Must have been absloutely nuts round here back in 2011 when they announced the particular slippery slope that is iCloud backup.
Re:Apple defends anti-child abuse imagery tech after claims ...
by __blockcipher__ on Wednesday August 18, 2021 @05:37PM
(#28227505)
It set the precedent for scanning server side. Which I don’t like but there’s really no way to avoid it anyway.
Now we have clientside scanning, and actually being led by the [note the scare quotes] “pro-privacy” two ton gorilla. It’s a whole different ballgame.
Re:Apple defends anti-child abuse imagery tech after claims ...
by Multicomp on Wednesday August 18, 2021 @05:28PM
(#28227410)
It was but it was one we were not in a position to resist at the time. Surrendered to almighty convenience.
But here appears to be beyond the pale such that people are saying "this far, no farther!"