Re:Hash collision in Apple NeuralHash model
by int_19h on Wednesday August 18, 2021 @08:54PM
(#28229119)
Which would still be a privacy violation, since an actual human is looking at a photo you haven't consented to share with them.
Re:Hash collision in Apple NeuralHash model
by brokenmachine on Wednesday August 18, 2021 @09:20PM
(#28229280)
That will be clearly laid out on page 1174 of Apples ToS that you had to click to be able to use your $1200 phone for anything but a paperweight.
Anyway, as for human reviewers, depends on what the image being perturbed is. Computer repair employees have called the police on people who've had pictures of their children in the bath. My understanding is that Apple does not have the source images, only NCMEC, so Apple's employees wouldn't necessarily see that such a case is a false positive. One would hope that when it gets sent to NCMEC, their employees would compare to the source image and see that is a false positive, though.