Subjectivity isn't an absolute all-or-nothing question. An issue having some degree of subjectivity doesn't automatically put it into a purely subjective, "all answers are equally valid" realm.
> eg your attempt at providing fact while your evidence is just more illustrations of familiarity which is entirely subjective).
I referred to some quantifiable metrics. Those have nothing to do with familiarity. Whether a number is larger or smaller than another number is a fact unaffected by your level of familiarity with either number.
You're really not responding at all to the substance of my comments, so you really don't have any justification for calling me "laughable" at this point. There are plenty of ways you could try to substantively refute my comments, instead of rejecting everything generally while mixing in insults.
I tried very hard to only bring up problems that were at least somewhat objective. Counting the number of superfluous symbols in the code is not purely subjective. Noting the similarity between "x01" and "x01a" is not purely subjective. Measuring the distance between a conditional test and its consequences is not purely subjective.
And I did figure out what a colon does in this language just by inspecting this code. It's semicolons that serve no apparent purpose in this snippet, and even with the outside knowledge that they serve the same statement separator purpose as in C and many other languages, it's still an objective fact that they are largely redundant. The character count could have been a lot lower if the language made it the default for new lines to start new statements and used a special character for continuing a statement on another line.
Subjective would have been if I complained about the semicolons being at the beginning of the line instead of at the end. That's almost purely a matter of taste driven by prior experience with other languages.