Re:What can be learned from studying long gone development p...
by wtallis on Tuesday August 17, 2021 @11:32AM
(#28210991)
> The fact that the OP had a different opinion to yourself about what he found readable is proof enough that it is subjective
Subjectivity isn't an absolute all-or-nothing question. An issue having some degree of subjectivity doesn't automatically put it into a purely subjective, "all answers are equally valid" realm.
> eg your attempt at providing fact while your evidence is just more illustrations of familiarity which is entirely subjective).
I referred to some quantifiable metrics. Those have nothing to do with familiarity. Whether a number is larger or smaller than another number is a fact unaffected by your level of familiarity with either number.
You're really not responding at all to the substance of my comments, so you really don't have any justification for calling me "laughable" at this point. There are plenty of ways you could try to substantively refute my comments, instead of rejecting everything generally while mixing in insults.
Subjectivity isn't an absolute all-or-nothing question. An issue having some degree of subjectivity doesn't automatically put it into a purely subjective, "all answers are equally valid" realm.
> eg your attempt at providing fact while your evidence is just more illustrations of familiarity which is entirely subjective).
I referred to some quantifiable metrics. Those have nothing to do with familiarity. Whether a number is larger or smaller than another number is a fact unaffected by your level of familiarity with either number.
You're really not responding at all to the substance of my comments, so you really don't have any justification for calling me "laughable" at this point. There are plenty of ways you could try to substantively refute my comments, instead of rejecting everything generally while mixing in insults.