News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GNU nano is my editor of choice by 908B64B197 on Friday August 13, 2021 @08:21PM (#28176510)
> The thesis of this post is roughly that nano, when configured, is enough of an editor for the author. Which is totally fine! People should be happy with their tools and not feel pressured by popularity to use what others use (vim, emacs being prime competitors in this case).

My advice to the author would be to give emacs an other shot. It can be configured to behave a lot like nano (and isn't modal), and runs in the terminal. But there's an ecosystem of plugins around it and has a lot of stuff that's built-in. But one day one of the journey it'll behave almost exactly as nano.

Re:GNU nano is my editor of choice by alpaca128 on Saturday August 14, 2021 @05:56PM (#28184256)
What's the point in making Emacs behave roughly like another editor when you can just use the original? Also, Emacs has about a million lines too much bloat for the target audience of Nano. Which is the one thing you can't fix by adding tons of plugins.