That on average, people whose first instinct is `nano` to edit a file in Linux have less experience than people whose first instinct is `vi(m)` (or, selfishly `emacs`).
> When someone uses a hobby or interest as a means of elevating themselves above others to give oneself a sense of being superior transforming their passion or knowledge about a particular subject into an ugly tool of self-inflation.
The shoe fits.
First editor I used was vi/vim.
For years it was the only editor I could use. (My CS education and school server use predates Pine/Pico/Nano and later on, it was a long time before nano was an option on more restrictive/specialized machines)
I still prefer nano.
In the end, I don't give a fuck what you use as long as you can get the job done.
Passing judgement on what people prefer to use is the de-facto definition of 'gatekeeping.'
> you bet I will judge your ability to code by your preference of editor,
FYI. That's called 'gatekeeping.'