...if and when you burn them with pure oxygen like done in rockets. Mostly they're burnt using using atmospheric oxygen though, leading to the production of nitrogen oxides (NOx) which come with their own problems [1]. It is possible to reduce the emission of these gases [2] at the cost of increased complexity and cost.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NOx#Health_and_environment_eff...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NOx#Regulation_and_emission_co...
Carbon dioxide is a permanent, global issue, where no (large-scale) capturing/cleaning methods exist.
NOx removes itself out of the atmosphere through natural means, CO2 does not.
You can close the cycle, hence 'ignore' CO2 emissions since they cancel out, and deal with NOx using today's existing technology. Same thing for PM and sulfur.
> NOx removes itself out of the atmosphere through natural means
...because of this [1], among others.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_impact_on_the_nitrogen_c...
Really, we should just put massive tax levies on fossil fuel extraction operations and call it a day. The market will sort the rest out.